| Most basic functionality: Check that it gives the correct result on a box with a hot and an opposite cold side. In that case, the thermal loss is (conductivity in W/mK) * (temperature gradient in K/m) * (cross section area in m^2) and TRfem gives the same value if the tet mesh is not wrong. |
 |
(pure Grasshopper example) |
trfemex01.ghx |
| Most basic functionality: Check that the temperature gradient is ten times as high in a material (plastic) with one tenth the conductivity of the other (steel), as it should be. Gives the same result as the 1D method (Glaser's method). |
 |
trfemex02.3dm |
trfemex02.ghx |
| The I-beam example with plastic insulation, from the paper, made with the example tet mesh component. That tet mesh is not a good finite element mesh, so the result is not very accurate. |
 |
(pure Grasshopper example) |
trfemex03.ghx |
| The I-beam example with plastic insulation, from the paper, made with a good finite element mesh from TRmesh. |
 |
trfemex04.3dm |
trfemex04.ghx |
| The Voronoi brick from the food4rhino seminar. |
 |
trfemex05.3dm CAUTION: about 300 MB |
trfemex05.ghx |
| Water vapor condensation at a box-shaped timber element. |
 |
(pure Grasshopper example) |
trfemex06.ghx |
| A cold/hot corner, tetmeshed and solved entirely in Grasshopper with the Grasshopper interface with TRmesh and TRfem |
 |
(pure Grasshopper example) |
trfemex07.ghx |